This summary is published as USGS Fact Sheet 2015-3026 and can be downloaded as a PDF file

Streamflow of 2014 - Water Year Summary

U.S. Geological Survey
Reston, Virginia

January 2015

National Overview
Regional Patterns
Seasonal Characteristics
High and Low Flows

Introduction

The maps and graphs in this summary describe streamflow conditions for water-year 2014 (October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2014) in the context of the 85-year period 1930-2014, unless otherwise noted. The illustrations are based on observed data from the U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) National Streamflow Information Program (http://water.usgs.gov/nsip). The period 1930-2014 was used because prior to 1930, the number of streamgages was too small to provide representative data for computing statistics for most regions of the country.

In the summary, reference is made to the term "runoff," which is the depth to which a river basin, State, or other geographic area would be covered with water if all the streamflow within the area during a specified time period was uniformly distributed upon it. Runoff quantifies the magnitude of water flowing through the Nation's rivers and streams in measurement units that can be compared from one area to another.

Each of the maps and graphs below can be expanded to a larger view by clicking on the image. In all the graphics, a rank of 1 indicates the highest flow of all years analyzed.

National Overview

Average runoff in the Nation’s rivers and streams during water-year 2014 (8.91 inches) was very close to the long-term annual mean for the United States (9.29 inches). Nationwide, 2014 streamflow ranked 52^nd out of the 85 years in the period 1930-2014. Note that in previous water-year summaries (prior to 2011) the median runoff, not the average runoff, was compared among time periods.

Much-below normal streamflow was reported in California and Arizona. Below-normal streamflow occurred in Nevada, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas, and Puerto Rico. Much above normal was reported only in Minnesota. Above normal streamflow occurred in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, New York, Maryland, and Delaware. Most states had streamflow in the normal range. Nationwide, streamflow ranked 52^nd out of 85 years.

** For Puerto Rico, 71 years of available data were used.

Regional Patterns

The United States (including Puerto Rico) is divided into 21 large drainages, or water resources regions. These hydrologic areas are based on surface topography and contain either the drainage area of a major river, such as the Columbia, the combined drainage areas of a series of rivers, such as the Texas-Gulf region which includes a number of rivers draining into the Gulf of Mexico, or the area of an island or island group. Water resources regions provide a coherent, watershed-based framework for depicting streamflow variations.

Streamflows at much-below normal levels were reported in the California (18) region. Below normal conditions were measured in the Great Basin (16), Lower Colorado (15), Rio Grande (13), Texas Gulf (12), and Puerto Rico (21) regions. Above normal streamflow was reported in the Souris-Red-Rainy (09), Upper Mississippi (07), and Great Lakes (04) regions.

** For Puerto Rico, 71 years of available data were used.

Seasonal Characteristics

		Autumn season (October-December) streamflow was at much below normal level in California. Below normal flows were reported in Washington, Oregon, Utah, Arizona, Iowa, Florida, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island. Hawaii also was at below normal level. Much above normal flows were reported in North Dakota and South Dakota. Above normal flows were reported in Kentucky, Ohio, West Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware. Nationwide, autumn season streamflow ranked 54^th out of 85 years. **For Puerto Rico, 71 years of available data were used.
		Winter season (January-March) streamflow was at record low levels in Nebraska. Much-below and below normal flows were reported mostly in southern and southwestern states: California, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi, and Wisconsin. Above normal streamflow was only reported in Maryland and Delaware. Nationwide, winter season streamflow ranked 68^th out of 85 years. **For Puerto Rico, 71 years of available data were used.
		Spring season (April-June) streamflow was at record low levels (ranking 85^th in 85 years) in Arizona. Streamflow was below or much-below normal in southwestern and southern states: California, Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, Texas, and Oklahoma. Puerto Rico also was at below normal level. Much-above normal streamflow was seen in central northern and some east coast and southern states: Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Maryland, Mississippi, and Alabama. Streamflow was above normal in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Indiana, Pennsylvania, New York, Vermont, Connecticut, New Jersey, Delware, Virginia, Georgia, and Florida. Nationwide, spring season streamflow ranked 23^th out of 85 years. **For Puerto Rico, 71 years of available data were used.
		Summer season (July-September) streamflow was higher than normal in central northern and some northeastern states: North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, New York, New Hampshire, and Maine; Arkansas also was at above normal level. Streamflow was below or much-below normal in California, Texas, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, Rhode Island, and Alaska. Nationwide, summer season streamflow ranked 36^th out of 85 years. **For Puerto Rico, 71 years of available data were used.

High and Low Flows

In any given month, on average, it is expected that five percent of the streamgages will experience very high (>95^th percentile) and very low (<5^th percentile) average streamflow. During water-year 2014, only May had a greater than expected percentage of streamgages reporting very high streamflow (8 percent). In contrast, there were 4 months (December, January, April, and May) with a greater than expected percentage of streamgages with very low flows (6, 8, 6, and 6 percent, respectively).

The bankfull streamflow is defined as the highest daily mean streamflow value expected to occur, on average, once in every 2.3 years. In 2014, 34 percent of streamgages had a daily mean streamflow value above the bankfull level. This value is lower than the expected number (43 percent) to occur in any given year. Since 1950, the largest number of streamgages reporting higher than bankfull streamflow in any one year was 69 percent, which occurred in 1996.

percentage above 10th percentile of annual 7-day minimum streamflow

The 10th percentile 7-day low flow is defined as the lowest 7-day average streamflow expected to occur, on average, once in every 10 years. In water-year 2014, 5 percent of the streamgages reported a 7-day low flow less than the 10th percentile 7-day low flow value. The expected number to occur in any given year is 10 percent. Since 1950, the largest percentage of streamgages reporting a 7-day low flow less than the 10th percentile 7-day low flow was 24 percent, which occurred in 1954.

Additional Information

The USGS operates a network of 8,124 streamgages nationwide, almost in real-time. Current information derived from these stations is available on the web at http://waterwatch.usgs.gov. Tables of data that summarize historical streamflow conditions by State, beginning in the year 1900, can be accessed at http://waterwatch.usgs.gov/?m=statesum. These tables are updated every few months to reflect the most current streamflow data.

The streamflow information used to prepare this summary is also used for water management, monitoring floods and droughts, bridge design, and for many recreational activities. To obtain real-time and archived streamflow data and information, visit http://water.usgs.gov/nwis. Although the national streamgage network is operated primarily by the USGS, it is funded by a partnership of 850 agencies at the Federal, State, tribal, and local levels, and USGS National Streamflow Information Program (http://water.usgs.gov/nsip/) and the USGS Cooperative Water
Program (https://water.usgs.gov/coop/about/monitors.html).

For additional information, contact:
	Office of Surface Water U.S. Geological Survey 415 National Center Reston, VA 20192 http://water.usgs.gov/osw/